2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Sites visited | 32 | 34 | 32 | 44 | 41 | 47 | 64 | 85 | 87 | 106 |
Unoccupied | 2 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 36 | 43 |
Occupied but no breeding | 13 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Average clutch size (where observed) |
4.8 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
Average brood size (where observed) |
3.1 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Number of chicks ringed | 33 | 46 | 19 | 63 | 70 | 47 | 90 | 126 | 119 | 170 |
It was apparent as the season progressed that brood sizes (and numbers of chicks ringed) was decreasing, but this is always hard to measure. But if we simply look at the number of chicks present at ringing through the season then a trend does seem to appear. The sample sizes are rather low, but we do think there's something in the data.
The much lower brood sizes later in the season we presume was due to the period of very unsettled weather, with plenty of rain. This makes feeding very difficult for adults which obviosuly has knock-on effects for chicks. We hope to be able to place cameras in numerous boxes over the winter (watch this space on that), which will give us much better data over the coming years.
No comments:
Post a Comment